Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 10
Engineers need math, but on their terms. July 7, 2002 Palle E T Jorgensen (Iowa City, Iowa United States) 15 out of 18 found this review helpful
At many US universities, math departments offer service courses in math for the engineers, and there is a periodic discussion of the curriculum. One difficulty is that the two sides speak different languages;-- in math, it is linear algebra, calculus...,- and in engineering, signals, high-pass/low-pass filters, downsampling/upsampling, filter bank, polyphase matrix...A wonderful feature of the Strang-Nguyen book is that it speaks both languages. In this way it is refreshing, and it stands outin a class of its own. It has been tested in courses for engineers, and stood the test. From what I hear, it is equally popular in the two cultures, math and engineering.
good book for a wavelet beginner October 24, 2008 Chia-chiunn Ho (UCSD) The book start from very basic concept, and then step by step lead you to wavelet, and end at applications.
You need only undergraduate level DSP knowledge to learn this.
Great Text/Reference April 5, 2008 Ed (RI) 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I have taken several courses on DSP. I found that this text takes topics that were presented, expanded them in great detail. It took some of the mystery out of my previous presentations. Anyone working with DSP should have this on their shelf!
a very good book in wavelets May 10, 2000 3 out of 10 found this review helpful
This is a very good book in wavelets. It's included theory of wavelets and its application.
UT PA - CAI Coordinator October 19, 2000 9 out of 9 found this review helpful
I am presently full time staff and part-time teacher electronics lab and doing research in image processing. I need a new way or new material so as to use wavelets for my research project. It is one of the most readable texts that I have encountered. I was looking for a very applied book and this seems a good one. There is one thing that I found disappointing. I found that in order to understand some things I had to jump to sections further into the book. Ideas are introduced and are not fully explained until later in the book. This leaves the reader puzzled and sometimes very confused when given the first exposure to a topic. I think the development of ideas could have been more cohesive. All in all, it's not a bad book as a reference
Showing reviews 1-5 of 10
|